Does It Matter If Beauty Is Objective? | James Grant (Oxford)
Does It Matter If Beauty Is Objective?
James Grant (Oxford)
A familiar question in aesthetics is whether beauty is objective. A less familiar question is whether it would be good if beauty is objective. Should we hope that robust aesthetic realism turns out to be true? Would this be better than the anti-realist and less robustly realist alternatives? Why? Metaethicists have recently been trying to articulate why it matters if moral values are objective. This paper initiates a similar project in aesthetics. I argue that the robust objectivity of beauty would be good in five ways that have not been sufficiently appreciated. Moreover, none of the less robust (and more popular) alternatives to robust objectivity would be good in the same ways and to the same degree.
The London Aesthetics Forum (LAF) is a Forum of the Institute of Philosophy at the University of London’s School of Advanced Study. With lectures on topics in aesthetics and philosophy of art, LAF aims to stimulate philosophical reflection on art. Our events are free and open to all.
View our programme of events, sign up for the newsletter, or browse our archives and podcasts.
Now available, episodes of Aesthetics Bites, a collaboration between the London Aesthetics Forum and Philosophy Bites (made possible by a grant from the British Society of Aesthetics).
We are generously sponsored by the British Society of Aesthetics
This page was last updated on 2 July 2024
